Zigma VAISHVILA: What to choose? A look at the presidential elections of the Republic – Respublika.lt

What is unique is that in this election they did not agree on what they would bet on, and offered us to choose from the three most intensively promoted by their paid media, which announces to us selective “real facts”, one single opinion on all issues of our lives. Also for “oppositional ” selection of candidates in the presidential elections of the Republic.

In order to once again consolidate the governed democracy, three “main” candidates were chosen, who began to advertise intensively before they were even official participants in the election campaign. However, in this way, they divided the votes of their voters, which greatly increased the chance of winning the elections for a candidate who does not represent the clan of those who took over the state.

In this game, those who have taken over the state bet on three candidates. Which?

For two, whose activities in the highest state positions we have seen in recent years.

First of all, the current President of the Republic Gitanas Nausėdas, who did not keep his promises to the voters, who announced that he will not even participate in the election campaign, but “allows” his wife to do it for him. For state funds. Without the CEC “seeing it”. And in the end, it turned out that the VSD controlled his activities throughout his tenure. The information published by the temporary commission of the Seimas reasonably allows us to draw such a conclusion. It is likely that he was blackmailed by the leadership of the VSD, as indicated by the hasty appointment of the well-earned Darius Jauniškis as director of the VSD for a second term, the “delegation” of high-ranking VSD officials to the main advisors of the President of the Republic. You only need to declassify some data to see this with evidence. But this is not happening, because only the VSD , that is, the party interested in this story, in our “democratic” state, has the right to declassify information. Even the court does not have such a right.

So, we are once again offered a head of state controlled by the VSD.

After the state secret of the Russian Federation, Dalia Grybauskaitė, who did not continue in 2009, led our state for 10 years. election promise to immediately deal with the “shameless” so-called oligarchs, when we were “happy” with the VSD-controlled President of the Republic for five more years, we do not want to step on the same “rake” again – the involuntary Gitanas Nausėda. His refusal to testify before the Seimas commission, his public lack of control after The publication of data by the temporary commission of the Seimas is very eloquent.

To be additionally discussed in the candidate, in a few days blatant and primitive manipulation of 37 thousand. voters’ “e-mail” support” Prime Minister Ingrida Šimonytė, who invaded the candidates, is no longer worth it. What is still unclear? The actor, surprising with a rare combination of audacity and open display of it, according to herself, is marked by Vytautas Landsbergius. As is Dalia Grybauskaitė.

The story of Ingrida Šimonytė’s “registration” as a candidate in these elections would have drowned in the sea of ​​indignation of numerous Internet commentators, if not for the complaints of candidate Eduard Vaitkaus to the court regarding the uniqueness of I. Šimonytė’s election epic.

Eduard Vaitkaus’ appeals to the court revealed the essential circumstances, confirmed the administrative takeover of the state, highlighted “Who is who” in these elections. The other candidates not only did not do this, but also did not join Eduard Vaitkaus’ complaints. Why? By doing so, they confirmed that they are or the clan that took over the state do we need a President of the Republic governed by fear or other means?

Ignas Vėgėlė, the head of the Lithuanian Bar Association, did not even do it twice. It is impossible to expect anything other than unconditional obedience to the financiers from Dainius Žalim, who not only “subjugated” the Constitutional Court of Lithuania to his will, but is also financed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs led by Gabrielias Landsbergis and the US State Department. As well as from Giedrim Jeglinsko, who unfortunately is just a NATO paid clerk. Working in such a structure with obligations unknown to voters. By the way, Ignas Vēgėlė should not brag about his good experience in the training of eight future European and Asian leaders organized by the US State Department, but explain who and how and why he was selected for these trainings.

Can we once again choose in the elections of the President of the Republic from among those who are not imposed on us by someone?

Why do we so quickly and recklessly rush to choose from the ruling clan’s foisted candidates who are foisted on us through their and state-funded opinion-former media and pollsters commissioned by them? Why are we reluctant to look for other information, compare it, weigh it and form our own opinion? It also takes advantage of the fact that most of us don’t have time for it.

That’s how we got to the third candidate Ignos Vēgėlė, who the system passes to us, who might be able to learn to speak without a prompter during the elections? Rūta Janutienė rushed to defend Igna Vēgėlė from the “attacks” of the signatory Zigmos Vaišvila. Let him defend himself, Rūta, go ahead and put your word on the live broadcast with Igna Vēgėle, ask him a simple question – why did he defend lawyer Audrias Aničs, who represents a company that doesn’t even exist? part of such “lawyers”?

Experienced journalist Rūta Janutienė rushed to justify Ignas Vēgėlė also for his father Algirdas Stasios Vēgėlė’s businesses in Belarus and Russia (construction of the residence of the President of Belarus, high-rise residential complexes in Minsk and Kaliningrad.

Dear Ruth, don’t change my question. My question is completely different – why does the Homeland Union, which Ignas Vēgėlė is trying to gently roast, not attack the businesses of Ignas Vēgėlė’s father in Russia and Belarus? After all, Belarusian dictator Alexander Lukashenko did not entrust the construction of his residence to just anyone.

After all, now even a special law is being recalled in the Seimas, apparently, due to the prohibition of one-person businesses in Russia! But this is apparently due to the Matijošaičius family being inflected in the media, and not due to the business of the Vēgėli family, which was started during the time and with the approval of the Minister of Economy of the Homeland Union, Vincos Babilius.

And the questions regarding the financing of Dalia Grybauskaitė’s election campaigns, Dalia Grybauskaitė’s decree, by which Ignas Vēgėlė was proposed as a judge of the European Court of Human Rights, await answers. If a member of the Vēgėli family is nominated for the position of President of the Republic, he must be open to voters and not be afraid to answer any question. If he is an honest candidate.

I think that the Labor Party candidate Andrius Mazuronis, who has not matured in decades due to corruption scandals, or Remigijus Žemaitaitis, who wants to achieve mainly through scandalous scandals on Rūta Janutienė’s YouTube channel, do not know what they want to achieve – they are not serious participants in the presidential elections of the Republic. Only one question remains interesting to me about them – if the two of them collected almost 6 thousand handwritten, or maybe even signed, voter signatures on paper voter support sheets, then why is the Central Election Commission fooling around and not handing over the information to the prosecutor’s office? After all, in a similar situation, the information about several hundred voter support signatures collected by Arūnas Valinskas was transferred to the prosecutor’s office. So far, I see only one answer – the ruling clan, which does not have one clear favorite in these elections, needs to split the opposition votes.

Therefore, there is only one opposition candidate, Eduardas Vaitkus. With all his pluses or minuses, but the only one whose information was blocked not only by LRT, but also by the entire media paid for by the ruling clan. Until this information block was broken by the decision of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, which forced the CEC to announce the election program of Eduard Vaitkaus.

The visibility of Eduard Vaitkaus, pierced by the court, his uniqueness, his only call to all of us to obey the Constitution and laws, is something that no other candidate talks about.

Why do candidates who do not speak about the supremacy of the law and the Constitution want to be the head of our state?

So suddenly we have a choice in the elections of the President of the Republic!

Who will we vote for? For the candidates proposed by the ruling clan or not?