The end of “Svieto”: gays and lesbians conflict with transsexuals – Respublika.lt

What are people, states, parties, organizations fighting for? For money and influence. Only all these trivially simple, nature-intelligible goals are masked by the struggle for RIGHTS.

Definitely damaged. Because otherwise, what are you defending? Therefore, some defend the right of glaciers not to melt, white bears or reeds not to disappear, people – to live, die, etc. And LGBT organizations are also called to defend. Your members.

The LGBT consumer market is worth $4.7 trillion. So it would be completely supernatural if the people operating with such money got along perfectly. And there would be no attempt to divide the trillions in such a way that some would have almost all the trillions, and others – if not zero, then almost. In this aspect, neither gays nor queer in principle, individuals cannot differ from two kiosks or two neighbors of a garden community. Huddled over a subway urchin.

But how do you defend yourself if you suddenly look around and see that no one is attacking? Same-sex marriages or partnerships are becoming more and more legal in the world. Especially in the West. But same-sex marriages are already allowed in Estonia, and same-sex partnerships are allowed in Latvia. So why, for example, should the Estonian LGBT community fight, if they have already received what they have been demanding and asking for for so long. What did they grumble about, complained to various human rights defenders, marched with banners. Why financially support a community that has already claimed its rights. It would be the same if a person acquitted by a court of law continued to pay his lawyer’s fees. And would even pretend to squat behind the bars.

So gays and lesbians living in countries where their marriages are legalized have lost the moral pretext to defend themselves. And this activity is to receive money from its supporters. But who voluntarily withdraws from the money pit? As a rule, such people need to be unambiguously recommended: “Get out of here!” Now this money will only be useful for transsexuals, fetishists and queer people! Because these groups of people don’t feel fully protected yet. And it’s true. I have yet to hear that the right of an exhibitionist with a buttoned-up shirt to startle passing minors in some Vilnius park would be defended.

According to a Polish newspaper, the World Organization for Professional Transgender Health (WPATH), which has great authority in the World Health Organization (WHO), also recognizes eunuchs (castrated men) as a separate gender identity. It remains for some organization to recognize harem odalisques (concubines) and legalize slavery. And thus activate the financial supporters of feminists. However, odalisques would at least not encroach on the common finances of the LGBT.

Now, if we were to believe “Rzeczpospolita”, those finances are already under the threat of an unfair distribution. Maybe we will even get to the time when a special international arbitration will have to examine the piles of people of non-traditional orientations. For example, determining who is more worthy of sponsors’ money from the cultural fund. A eunuch seeking to revive the traditions of medieval sultans, or a modern eunuch turning into unicorn butterflies.

An ironic conclusion comes to mind – if we want exhibitionists, transgenders, eunuchs, etc. in Lithuania not to mess with “traditional gays”, to live side by side, hand in hand, same-sex marriages or partnerships cannot be legalized in any way. For the prevention of discord. After all, no one would want that Lesbians in Lithuania would fight with transsexuals. Aiman, one joint parade is better than three separate ones.

In addition, if same-sex marriage were to be legalized in Lithuania, it would be a huge blow to the Freedom Party. She should secretly pray that the Seimas does not approve same-sex partnerships. Not to mention marriages. Because otherwise, who needs such a party? To burn a baby in an advertisement? Or to hypocritically shout about Vitali and Albino, who did not dare to admit to being gay for 52 years? But without even trying to actually keep their identities secret. Only for partisan interest by using two gullible people.