They demanded a million euros for the termination of the electricity supply contract, but the court’s opinion was different

They demanded a million euros for the termination of the electricity supply contract, but the court’s opinion was different
They demanded a million euros for the termination of the electricity supply contract, but the court’s opinion was different
--

UAB “FishNet” and UAB “Enefit” in 2022. concluded a fixed-price electricity purchase-sale agreement in August, which provided that the agreement could be terminated under the conditions specified in it by paying a termination fee. The procedure for calculating this tax was specified in the conditions of the decision (pricing) of the fixed and exchange price electricity purchase.

UAB “FishNet” initiative from 2023 the contract was terminated at the end of June, therefore, as UAB “Enefit” claimed in the lawsuit, the company that terminated the contract must pay a termination fee – about 1.14 million. Eur. UAB “FishNet”, disagreeing with the submitted lawsuit, claimed that it, as a small company, used the right established in the Law on Electricity to terminate the contract unilaterally and free of charge without a termination fee and/or damages.

The panel of judges of the Lithuanian Court of Appeal, which examined the case, noted that the provisions of Directive (EU) 2019/944 on the general rules of the internal electricity market, which provide that European Union member states must ensure that, upon termination of the electricity supply contract, at least household consumers and small companies would not have to pay any supplier change fees, the Law on Electricity and Energy was established not from 2023. on June 1, as stated by UAB “Enefit”, but from 2021 July 15

Although UAB “FishNet” and UAB “Enefit” in 2022 the concluded electricity purchase and sale agreement provided for a termination fee, but, based on the Directive and the Electricity Law implementing it, it could not be applied when terminating the contract, therefore there is no legal basis for awarding EUR 1,143,973 to UAB “Enefit” from UAB “FishNet”, – stated the Court of Appeal.

The ruling of the Lithuanian Court of Appeal in civil case no. e2A-205–407/2024 enters into force on the day of its adoption, but within three months from the day of adoption it can be appealed in the cassation procedure to the Supreme Court of Lithuania.

The article is in Lithuanian

Lithuania

Tags: demanded million euros termination electricity supply contract courts opinion

-

PREV In the streets of the old town of Vilnius – a different world: jellyfish and tulips immerse you in the fantasy of a dream | Names
NEXT We invite you to submit applications for partial financing of projects of youth initiatives, formal youth organizations, public organizations working with youth and informal youth groups from the municipal budget